‘Unwavering Support’? No! Obama Attacking Your Religious Freedom

Charlie Butts, OneNewsNow.com
September 26, 2012

Given the president’s recent statement on religious freedom, one legal group finds it ironic that the DOJ has appealed a Denver federal judge’s decision to uphold a business owner’s religious freedom to decline the government mandate requiring him to provide insurance coverage for abortifacient drugs.

Hercules Industries now comes under the scrutiny of a federal appeals court because the owners are standing firm on their convictions.

Attorney Matt Bowman of Alliance Defending Freedom tells OneNewsNow, “Every American, including family business owners, should be free to live and do business according to their faith.”

“The Obama administration claims it has unwavering support for religious freedom, but the only thing unwavering in the administration is its tenacious opposition to religious freedom,” the attorney asserts.

The mandate forces employers, regardless of their religious or moral convictions, to provide insurance coverage for abortion-inducing drugs, sterilization and contraception under threat of heavy penalties.

“The cost of religious freedom for this family could be millions of dollars per year in fines and lawsuits from the federal government to cripple their business and potentially destroy jobs,” Bowman warns. “In filing its appeal, the administration sent a clear message that it wants to force families to abandon their faith in order to earn a living. That’s the opposite of religious freedom.”

The administration argues that people of faith forfeit their religious liberty once they engage in business.

Advertisements
  1. #1 by arizona today on October 19, 2012 - 3:08 pm

    President Obama’s Department of Justice Once Again Rejects Protection for Religious Liberty

    By Jordan Lorence, Op-Ed Contributor, The Christian Post

    October 19, 2012|9:26 am

    In contradiction to President Obama’s words of his “unwavering support” for religious liberty and the “right to worship,” his Department of Justice has decided not to support the right of religious groups to meet in empty public schools in New York City for their worship services. This decision is particularly surprising and disappointing because it reverses the support the DOJ has stated three times before in this case for the right of religious groups to meet in NYC public schools on the same terms and conditions that it allows other community groups to meet.

    This case has lasted 18 years. It centers on Bronx Household of Faith, a small evangelical Christian church meeting in a poor neighborhood, which has challenged a NYC public school rule that bans private worship services during nonschool hours. Right now, religious groups are meeting in the schools because of a lower court ruling striking down the policy. NYC appealed the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which will hear the case November 19.

    This will be the fifth time the appeals court has heard this case. In the past three appeals, the DOJ has filed friend of the court briefs strongly supporting the First Amendment rights of Bronx Household of Faith and other religious groups to meet in the schools. The DOJ has repeatedly agreed with Bronx Household of Faith that it is unconstitutional for NYC to single out religious worship services and exclude them from meeting in the 1,200 school buildings (which were used for 120,000 different meetings during the 2010-11 school year alone).

    However, with this appeal, President Obama’s leaders at the DOJ decided to break with the department’s repeated past support for equal access. And there is no explanation for this abrupt change of course.

    Allowing religious groups to meet in public buildings the same way that other groups can meet is common sense, as well as what the Supreme Court has ruled the Constitution requires at least five times since 1981. Why is Obama’s DOJ declining to follow the position its predecessors have taken repeatedly in the past?

    This fits a disturbing pattern in which President Obama claims that he supports religious liberty, but then his lawyers at the DOJ either oppose it or fail to support it when the opportunity to act arises.

    Last January, we saw the embarrassing spectacle of a DOJ attorney before the Supreme Court, arguing in the Hosanna-Tabor case, that churches have no more constitutional right to choose their leaders than labor unions have. All nine justices rejected the DOJ’s stunningly cramped view of religious liberty, including Justice Elena Kagan, President Obama’s first Solicitor General at the DOJ before being appointed to the Supreme Court.

    Also, DOJ attorneys have strongly opposed lawsuits by religious institutions and small businesses owned by people of faith who oppose the HHS mandate requiring them to pay for abortifacients and contraceptives for their employees, in conflict with their prolife religious beliefs. What is especially galling about the DOJ’s opposition in these cases is its refusal to obey the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, a federal law Congress passed so that people with conscientious objections would have an opportunity to argue in court that they are entitled to an exception from a specific federal law. Rather than accommodating the prolife beliefs of the religious people and institutions here, the DOJ opposes them.

    President Obama and Attorney General Holder should put some actions behind their verbal support for religious liberty. They made a huge mistake when they decided to sit out the Bronx Household of Faith case and not add the U.S. Government’s voice to oppose NYC’s policy banning private worship services in school buildings. Religious liberty is not just a platitude but something the Constitution requires the federal government to protect.

    Jordan Lorence is senior counsel with Alliance Defending Freedom (www.alliancedefendingfreedom.org), actively defending marriage laws and amendments throughout the U.S

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: